Help Spread the Word
Help spread the word
about BuyandSellplus,
the leading online
classified ads and buy
and sell website
in the Philippines. If you
have a website or blog,
you can use the HTML
code below to display
the BuyandSellPlus.com
banner.
Embed:
CLASSIFIEDS
BUY AND SELL » Books & Publication
» Non-fiction
THIS ITEM HAS EXPIRED
MUGGLENET.COM'S HARRY POTTER SHOULD HAVE DIED: CONTROVERSIAL VIEWS FROM THE #1 FAN SITE
Total Views: 512
Updated on: Mar 28, '12 Expiring on: Sep 24, '12 Posted on: Mar 28, '12
Avoid being Scammed! Deal with members you can meet in person.
Expand
Sypnosis
HARRY POTTER DIDN'T DIE.
The seventh and final book is out, but fans still fiercely debate the many controversial issues left unresolved. Now, the experts at MuggleNet.com argue passionately about what really happened and what should have happened.
•Would the series be stronger if Harry hadn't survived?
•Should we pity Voldemort or hate him?
•Is Severus Snape really a hero?
•Should J.K. Rowling have left Dumbledore's gay sexual orientation a secret?
•Did Harry actually die in Deathly Hallows?
•Were the Slytherins too demonized, the Hufflepuffs too lame, and the Gryffindors too glorified?
•Should J.K.R. write more Harry Potter novels or go out on top?
Title: MUGGLENET.COM'S HARRY POTTER SHOULD HAVE DIED: CONTROVERSIAL VIEWS FROM THE #1 FAN SITE Author: Spartz, Emerson/ Schoen, Ben/ Kimsey, Jeanne (CON) ISBN: 9781569757116 Publisher: Pgw Format: Paperback Price: PHP 599.00
KEYWORDS: Fully Booked, MUGGLENET.COM'S HARRY POTTER SHOULD HAVE DIED: CONTROVERSIAL VIEWS FROM THE #1 FAN SITE, Spartz, Emerson/ Schoen, Ben/ Kimsey, Jeanne (CON)
BE ADVISED: Whether online or in the real world, communicating, transacting or trading with our members in order to avail of any product or service
posted here must be done with your usual vigilance, sagacity and discernment. Please be guided that our members' right to privacy is of utmost
importance. Accordingly, we make no attempt to monitor their transactions arising from their postings nor do we conduct any background investigation
of the members. Contracts, written or otherwise, with a member based on their postings here is a matter solely between such member and their
customer or client. Unless positively stated, all posts are not endorsed by us. more details